Justification for the War in Iraq!

As part of the seven count list of particulars that was submitted to the UN to justify the war with Saddam and the Terrorists Colin Powel stated that in 1994 Saddam Hussein admittedly planned an assaination attempt on United States President George Bush 41.

Today Tariq Aziz said "It was an assassination attempt against the president, and this party also tried to assassinate me in 1980," Aziz said. "If the head of state comes under attack, the state is required by law to take action. If the suspects are caught with weapons, it's only natural they should be arrested and put on trial."

Makes sense to me. lol

Biased media only reports anti American hecklers.

I was recently at a "Town Hall Meeting" conducted by representatives Caroline Malonney and Jack Murtha. The "Town Hall Meeting" was conducted by the Community Church of NY which is most known for its close relationship with Saddam Hussein Defense attorney and Neo Stalinist founder of ANSWER Ramsey Clark. The "Church" also has a close relationship with a group called the Lawyers Guild which has been involved with violent attacks on police officers in San Francisco and in New York sending patrolmen to intensive care units.

I made my way through the tables set up by Laruche and the American Socalist Front to take my seat in front next to a 70 year Korean War Vet and a 60 year old DNC Cheerleader. After sitting through 1 hour and fourty five minutes of anti-bush hate speach. I have come to the conclusion, that Murtha image of hesitant patriot that is portrayed by the media is entirely off base. It seems to me that he is a bitter old man who was at one time passed over for a higher commission and is expressing his views that are shadded by his incomplete knowledge of military doctrine, strategic intelligence and foriegn affairs.

I took an afternoon out my busy schedule to go to this "Town Hall Meeting" because I had questions about Murtha's ideas and wanted to get an more complete understanding of the issues. Well the questions I had such as "Mr. Murtha, you said that 'the US could montior the Middle East using an over the horizon stratedgy'. Also, on meet the press you said over 'the horizon was defined as stationing the Middle East Expeditionary Force in Guam'. 'Mr. Murtha, do you know Guam is in Asia and 7,000 distant from Bagdad?"

After carefully listening to the points he made, I got on line to ask a new question that spoke more directly to Mr. Murtha's speach. My new question is "Congressmen Murtha, it seems to me that your primary reason for withdrawal is you do not want the troops to be caught up in a Iraqi Civil war. Mr. Mutha would not you agree the Alqaida thrived in the conditions set by the Afgan Civil War and that 9/11 would not have been possible without safe haven that was provided to UBL by Afganistan and the Un mandated conditions of the Soviet Withdrawl? Under your plan why wouldn't Iraq become another Afganistan?" I never go to ask these questions. I was not allowed to go on line and ask and was told all the qustions were planted by DNC operatives.

When I refused to get off the line I was escorted out of Hall and booed and spit on by the Partisan Liberals that sponsored the event. I can't stop recalling what the staffer said to me as I was escorted out by the DNC stormtroopers, " Freedom of speach did not apply and they were not here to wast time with stupid questions". My point, NBC news cameras where there they panned on me as I attempted to ask my question and yet it never made the evening news.

The case for lower energy taxes.

Going after US based oil companies is perhaps the most feckless idea I have ever heard. This country needs to become energy independent and handicapping the leading investors in US energy indepence is a ignorant solution to a complex problem.

Oil companies are leveraged risky companies that put thier capital on the line to make profits. Leverage is defined as use of debt to make large investments. When profitable leverage creates larger returns when unprofitable leveraged companies go bankrupt. Taking risk sometimes does not work out, one reason Enron is in court today is due to their speculation that prices would go up in the short term. True, the oil companies have been making a lot of money because price and demand is up.

An ironic fact is the federal goverment also benefits from high prices because of the taxes it charges the oil companies. Last quarter Exxon Moble had energy related sales of $86 billion ,thats pretty impressive. However, as it turns out oil is not that profitable an investment despite the huge volume of sales. XOM's profits before income taxes are roughly 14 billion (taking out the compay's profits from non oil related activities). XOM makes roughly 14 cents on every dollar of sales before taxes. By comparison Microsoft makes 43 cents on every dollar of sales; in other words Microsoft is 68% more profitable. Moreover, Chuck Schumer's largest campaign contributer Goldman Sach's makes 50% more on every dollar of its sales as Compared to EXXON. The federal goverment made more from high energy prices than EXXON has because it taxes EXXON's products and profits. Exxon is faced with a 45% income tax rate which means the goverment collects from Exxon shareholders 45 cents from every dollar Exxon's profits.

The goverment also collects income taxes from Exxons employees and charges consumers tarrifs and use taxes on the gas and fuel oil consumers purchase at the gas station. For example, durning the last quarter the federal goverment collected a total of $16 billion dollars in income taxes and duties from EXXON and shareholders recieved just $6.5 billion. Perhaps a wind fall tax cut from the goverment is more in order. In conclusion, we the people need the US based energy companies if we are going to migrate to other fuels because the current Oil distribution system is supper efficient and can be redeployed to distribute any type of fuel including bio diesel, eythenol or hydrogen.

Going after US based oil companies is a strategic mistake an will hurt the long term intrests of the US. On solution is to tax foriegn owned oil companies. Russian and Venezuelan owned oil companies have access to OIL at a cost of $6 per barrel and perhaps CITGO and GETTY should be taxed at higher rates to compensate American consumers and promote alternative fuels.

Thank You

Recently several intelligence discoveries have undermined several key arguments pushed down our throats on a daily basis by the out of touch liberal media, radicals, communists, taitors and radically liberal Democrats against the war.

Thanks to Stephan Hayes of the weekly standard and Senator Peter Hoekstra thousands of formerly secret Iraqi State Intellegence documents where recently released to the public. These documents had been vaulted by the US goverenments intellegence community and hidden from public consumption. Contrary to the claims made by several partisan intelligence officials and the 9/11 commission these documents prove beyond any doubt that

The Iraqi Goverement:

1) Developed and maintained WMDs
2) Had active operational ties to Al Qaida, Answar Al Islam, the PLO and other active terrorist organizations.
3) Moreover, these documents also contain recordings of Saddam making terroristic threats to the US and its allies.
4) These documents prove there pre-war operation links to intelligence officers working with Russia, Syria, Brazil and Iran and indicate that Saddam's WMDs were probably transfered to these countries in December of 2002.
5) Bottom line these documents prove that the CIA got it wrong again and is motivated by politics and public relations and not the Security of this nation and the preservation of freedom.

A Problem with Kofi Annan He Runs Prison Camps!

Amnesti International Says This About Kofi's Home Country:

The National Reconciliation Commission (NRC) ended its hearings in July. Established by the government in 2002, initially for one year, its task was to compile a record of human rights violations committed during Ghana’s periods of unconstitutional rule since independence in 1957, and to recommend reparations and reforms. Most of the witnesses were victims of human rights violations under the military governments headed by former President J.J. Rawlings. Many of the 2,000-plus testimonies that were heard spoke of summary executions, “disappearances”, torture and ill-treatment.The NRC’s report and recommendations were submitted to President Kufuor on 12 October but had not been made public by the end of 2004. The recommendations reportedly included reparations for about 3,000 victims and reforms of institutions including the security agencies.Women’s rightsDespite being made a criminal offence in 1994, female genital mutilation continued to be practised, particularly in the north. In January, a 70-year-old woman from Koloko, Upper East Region, who had performed female genital mutilation on seven girls, was convicted and sentenced to five years’ imprisonment.A draft Domestic Violence Bill had not yet been tabled in Parliament by the end of 2004, despite wide support from women’s organizations and other civil society groups. The bill aimed to strengthen official responses to complaints of violence against women and to broaden remedies available to the courts.

Human Rights Watch Says This About Kofi's Home Country:


Government Denies Existence of Political Prisoners Minister Says Detainees "Safer" in Custody
Introduction Ghana's ruling Provisional National Defence Council (PNDC), chaired by Flt. Lt. Jerry Rawlings, has claimed -- for the third time in as many years -- that Ghana has no political prisoners. In a radio interview on May 31, Secretary for Foreign Affairs Obed Asamoah, argued that some detainees -- whom he characterized as "subversives" -- are being kept in custody for their own good. He added that if they were brought to trial, they would be convicted and executed. The first claim is deliberately misleading. Africa Watch knows of the existence of a number of detainees incarcerated in Ghana, though it is difficult to estimate the exact number in the light of government denials. One group -- of ten detainees -- was moved to different prisons on the same day -- January 14, 1991. One member of this group is known to have been held without charge or trial since November 1982. Their detentions have never been officially explained. The minister's argument that detainees are better protected in custody amounts to a manifest presumption of guilt, and makes it unlikely that any detainee in Ghana can now receive a fair trial. The government's denial is also contradicted by the publication on May 30 of a list of 76 "political prisoners and other detainees" by the opposition Movement for Freedom and Justice (MFJ). According to the MFJ's information at the time, none of the 76 had been charged or tried. The PNDC Secretary for the Interior, Nana Akuoku Sarpong, has characterized the list as a mixture of "lies and half truths," calculated to discredit the government. News from Africa Watch 2 August 12, 1991 A disturbing feature of the government's current attitude towards opposition, both before and since the publication of the MFJ's list of detainees, is the attempt to link its critics with subversion and terrorism. Both the Secretary for the Interior and Flt.Lt. Rawlings himself have recently made such accusations, in public speeches and in the state-owned media. Opponents of the government believe that this campaign is designed to prepare the ground for a possible new wave of detentions in the run-up to the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) summit scheduled to be held in Accra in September. PNDC Laws "Justify" Indefinite Detention Under PNDC Law 4, the Council has the power to detain any person indefinitely, so long as the Council believes it is "in the interest of national security or the safety of the person to do so." Under an August 1984 amendment to the 1964 Habeas Corpus Act (PNDC Law 91), the courts may no longer inquire into such cases of "administrative" or "preventive detention." Under Law 4, the PNDC can oblige anyone released from preventive custody to notify the police of any plans to travel outside Ghana, and also of "such matters as the Commissioner of Police may reasonably specify." The Quashigah Case So unwilling is the government to tolerate dissent that those currently in detention without charge or trial include Maj. Courage Quashigah, one of the most respected soldiers in the Ghana Armed Forces and, until his arrest, a pillar of support for the government. The government alleges -- although he has not been charged with the offence -- that Maj. Quashigah and others plotted to assassinate Flt.Lt. Rawlings. The PNDC chairman had been due to address a public meeting in Ho, in the Volta Region, on September 23, 1989, but he canceled the engagement. Maj. Quashigah is a former Chief Operations Officer at PNDC headquarters, and a former commander of the Military Police. On May 19, 1983, he led loyal troops to recapture the national radio station during an abortive coup attempt. One of Maj. Quashigah's fellow detainees, Flt.Lt. W.K.Domie, died soon after his detention in mysterious circumstances; according to the official version of his death, he had committed suicide in his cell.
Significantly, the Defence Ministry statement of October 6, 1989, which first publicized the
arrests two weeks after they had occurred, described the five named detainees as being "among
those arrested and being kept in custody" -- making it clear that the government was unwilling to acknowledge exactly how many people it had detained in connection with the alleged plot.
Maj. Quashigah was actually arrested on September 26, 1989 with at least four others --
Squadron-Leader Edward Akakpo, Abdulai Yusif Mohamed, Flt.Lt. Domie and Kwabena
Donkor -- for "their alleged involvement in activities which could have compromised the security of the state." The Ministry of Defence said that a four-man military Board of Inquiry had been set

News from Africa Watch 3 August 12, 1991
up to investigate the alleged plot. On November 10, 1989, a summary of the Board's findings --
published in the state-owned press -- reported that Flt.Lt Domie had used his own clothing to hang himself in his cell. Fears have since been expressed for the safety of the remaining detainees. On October 10, 1989, according to the state-owned People's Daily Graphic newspaper, guards at the Bureau of National Investigations (BNI) foiled an escape attempt. Maj. Quashigah pleaded for forgiveness, according to the paper. The publication of a summary of the Board's findings -- rather than the full report -- is in itself an abuse of due process. The suspects in the affair stand accused in the state-controlled press of planning to assassinate the Head of State. Whether they are eventually to be tried under civil or military law, their right to a fair trial has already been compromised by the publication of a detailed official version of events. According to some sources, the Board's full report fails to reach a conclusion as definitive as that contained in the summary, because only two of the suspects admitted to taking part in a conspiracy. One of them -- Flt.Lt. Domie -- is now dead, leaving the authorities insufficient grounds on which to mount a prosecution. In January 1990, another group of five people was reported to have been detained in connection with the Quashigah affair. Of this second group, Chris Amematey, a BNI officer, is still believed to be detained without charge.
These events generated considerable tension within the armed forces, where Maj.
Quashigah still has a following. Nevertheless, there continues to be near-total official silence about the reasons for the continued detention of the suspects. The case was however given prominence in the announcement of a June 4, 1990 amnesty for prisoners, which specified that the amnesty did not cover "a group of persons arrested in September [1989] and January [1990] in connection with subversive activities." Government efforts to brand Maj. Quashigah and his co-accused as "subversives" have failed to convince many Ghanaians. It is believed in Ghana that following his role in the 1983 coup attempt, Flt.Lt. Rawlings had come to regard Maj. Quashigah as a personal political threat. Whatever the true reasons for the detention of Maj. Quashigah and his colleagues for nearly two years, it is widely believed that they are in custody solely for expressing the view that the PNDC should leave the political arena.
Maj. Quashigah is known to be detained with Squadron Leader Edward Akakpo, Joy
Cudjoe and Simon Sablah of the Commandos, Abdulai Yusif Mohamed of the Armed Forces
Reserve Battalion and Chris Amematey. Sablah and Cudjoe are thought to be held in Nsawam
Prison, and the other four at BNI headquarters. It is possible that the government is unwilling to resolve their cases in the courts because Flt.Lt. Rawlings and Maj. Quashigah are related. This may explain, in part, the government's perceived reluctance to bring the case to court after nearly two years. However if Maj. Quashigah is tried and is not sentenced to death, as many others found guilty of treason or subversion have been in the past, the government also runs the risk of being

News from Africa Watch 4 August 12, 1991
accused of tribalism. Given the politically sensitive nature of this case, it appears that the PNDC is prepared for these six detainees -- and any other suspects -- to remain in detention indefinitely. Africa Watch is calling on the Ghana government to charge these men if there is any evidence of wrongdoing; to bring them to court without further delay; and to ensure that they are given a fair trial. Otherwise, they should be released immediately and unconditionally.
Other Detainees and Political Prisoners Africa Watch is also concerned about the fate of ten other detainees, who the government has never acknowledged as being in detention. Their names do not appear in the MFJ's list of 76 detainees. The ten -- nine civilians and one soldier -- were dispersed to different places of detention around Ghana on the same day -- January 14, 1991. One member of this group -- Ras Seth Djamah Tei, a businessman detained in 1989 -- is
known to be seriously ill. On January 14, Tei was moved to Nsawam prison. But since March 26
this year, Mr. Tei has been undergoing treatment at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Accra for heart disease, chest pains and hypertension, among other ailments. He is also known to suffer from dizzy spells as a result of swings in his blood pressure, and was readmitted to the hospital on June 6. Despite his condition, Mr. Tei lies chained to his hospital bed.
Another member of this group, Bombardier Mustapha Mohamed, who was moved to
Koforidua prison earlier this year, is known to have been in detention since November 1982, after testifying for the prosecution at a subversion trial, following an abortive coup attempt that month. He was not released after giving his evidence.
Africa Watch is publishing all ten names in the hope that this will elicit further information
about the circumstances of their detention.

They are:
1. Galley Sackey (Ho Prison).
2. James Zogah Lamotzo (Ho Prison).
3. Samuel Abrokwa (Anomabu Prison)
4. Abubakari Alhassan (Anomabu Prison).
5. Ras Seth Djamah Tei (Nsawam Prison)
6. Abdan Abaloo (Nsawam Prison).
7. Bombardier Mustapha Mohamed (Koforidua Prison).
8. P.Y.Kumordjie (Akuse Prison).
9. Christian Attachey (Kpandu Prison).
10. Kofi Dzomeku (Sekondi Prison).
News from Africa Watch 5 August 12, 1991

Long-Term Detainees

In addition to those whose names are highlighted above, Africa Watch is particularly
concerned about detainees who have been in detention for almost all of the time that the PNDC has been in power.

They include:
* Jacob Yidana, the former Deputy Superintendent of Police. His investigations in 1982 led
the Special Investigations Board which inquired into the abduction and murder of three
judges and a retired army officer to recommend the prosecution of Capt.(retd) Kojo Tsikata,
who is now the PNDC member for security and foreign affairs.1 Yidana was sentenced to
eight years with hard labor by a Public Tribunal in 1983, and is believed to be in the annex
block at Nsawam Prison. The authorities allege that he was harboring a fugitive from
justice. But it appears that the real reason for his imprisonment was his role in investigating
the judges' murders. Prisoners usually serve two-thirds of their sentences, so Yidana would
normally have been released in 1989. Yidana is known to be losing his eyesight, although it
is not clear whether this is a direct result of his incarceration.
* Private Sam Twumhene, is currently in Nsawam Prison following his arrest in 1983 on
suspicion of involvement in a plot to overthrow the PNDC. He is in detention without
charge under PNDC Law 4.
* Corporal Rexford Ohemeng, was arrested in 1983 on suspicion of involvement in a coup
attempt, and is detained without charge under PNDC Law 4 in Nsawam prison.
* Lance Corporal Moses Harley, currently in Kpandu Prison, has been in detention without
charge under PNDC Law 4 since 1985. He testified for the prosecution in a subversion case,
and is reported to have suffered torture.
The PNDC's Amnesty Offer
The possibility that a recently announced amnesty for political exiles could be used as a
pretext to arrest the government's most-wanted opponents cannot be ruled out. The amnesty, the
latest in a series of measures officially aimed at promoting national reconciliation, was announced
in Kumasi on June 19 by the Secretary for the Interior. Apprehensions about the potential abuse of
the amnesty are heightened by the case of Colonel T.T. Kutin, Transport Minister under a previous
military regime and a former air force officer. In 1985, he responded to a similar offer and returned
1 See News from Africa Watch, Lawyers Detained for Commemorating Judges' Murder, July 14, 1989, p3.
News from Africa Watch 6 August 12, 1991
home. He was immediately detained under PNDC Law 4 and released under a government amnesty
on June 4, 1990, after five years in detention.
The government's latest amnesty offer is accompanied by an invitation to anyone who
thinks their friends or relatives may have been unjustly detained to write to the government seeking
redress. This has been seen as a tacit admission that there might be political prisoners or victims of
arbitrary arrest in detention of whom the government is not aware. But the invitation could also
have more sinister implications for some detainees. Given the general lack of publicity surrounding
detentions under the PNDC, to express concern that a friend or relative is in jail for political reasons
could lead to their being officially charged with a political offence, even if that is not the reason
why they were originally arrested.
A further reason for a cautious response to the amnesty offer is the experience of K.A.A.
Brempong, who was finally freed after four years in detention under a government amnesty on June
4, 1990. Brempong's release had previously been announced under an amnesty in February 1987, but he was not in fact released. On July 2, the Secretary for the Interior modified his June 19 offer by stating that only those who have been convicted by a court or a public tribunal, together with anyone declared wanted by the police for a criminal offence, would be excluded. These modifications still allow room for possible abuse. The legislative instrument granting the amnesty -- as announced in an official statement -- does not prevent anyone from being declared wanted after returning from exile. In addition, the standards applied in cases heard in the public tribunal system fall well below internationally-recognized standards.2
The PNDC's Position on Detainees Reacting twelve days later to the MFJ's list of "detainees and political prisoners," Interior Secretary Nana Sarpong told the press on June 11 that there are no political prisoners in Ghana, and that the only military personnel in detention are those who have testified during trial to participating in "subversive" activities for which others have been punished. Both statements are inaccurate. Major Quashigah and his fellow detainees have never been charged or tried, and have therefore never had a chance to answer the accusations levelled against them. Nana Sarpong claimed that 28 of those named by the MFJ as "political detainees" are being held on "purely criminal" charges, such as drug trafficking, fraud and kidnapping. In fact he misrepresented the MFJ's claim. The Movement made it clear when it published the list that it includes both "detainees" and "political prisoners." And the fact that according to Nana Sarpong the 28 face criminal charges does not excuse the length of time it has taken to bring some of their cases to court. 2 See News from Africa Watch, Lawyers Detained for Commemorating Judges' Murder, July 14, 1989, pp 4-5. News from Africa Watch 7 August 12, 1991 The Secretary for the Interior also criticized the list because it contains the names of six
military personnel who were in detention, but have since been freed. In fact, Nana Sarpong's
published explanations so far cover just 22 detainees -- less than one-third -- of the number believed by the MFJ to be in detention. Four of those he singles out, as reported by the state-controlled Ghana News Agency on June 12, do not even feature on the MFJ's list. Nana Sarpong thus failed to confirm if the remaining 58 people listed are actually in detention, and if so on what grounds. The preponderance of military personnel on the list is an indication of the government's perception of the source of the main threat to its security. But opposition to PNDC policies has also been expressed by a number of former senior civilian officials, many of whom are in exile as a result. The NAM Summit Fears of a crackdown by the PNDC in the run-up to the NAM summit, using the powers of PNDC Law 4 to detain members of the opposition indefinitely, have been heightened by an ongoing campaign in the state-controlled media. MFJ Deputy National Secretary, Kwesi Pratt, was accused in the People's Daily Graphic on April 29 of discussing "ways of supplying the leaders and agents of the group with weapons...as well as plans for disrupting the non-aligned ministerial conference." A wide spectrum of opponents of the PNDC are accused in the same article of planning to "incite workers, teachers and Kumasi traders...to cause violent unrest."

On June 4 -- the twelfth anniversary of Flt.Lt. Rawlings' first seizure of power -- he flew
back to Accra during the Organization of African Unity summit being held in Nigeria, to warn that he would exact "a heavy price" from those individuals and groups who advocate a violent road to Ghana's political future. Although the MFJ is a non-violent movement, formed in 1990 in response to the PNDC's decision to hold a nationwide debate on Ghana's political future, opponents of the PNDC fear that Flt.Lt. Rawlings' warning will be used as a pretext to detain them. They point out that these attacks in the media closely echo the pattern of events in 1987, when eight prominent opponents of the PNDC were detained without charge for between 18 months and two years.3 3 See News from Africa Watch, Lawyers Detained for Commemorating Judges' Murder, July 14, 1989, pp 7-8

News from Africa Watch 8 August 12, 1991
Recommendations for Action
Africa Watch is urging the Ghana government:
* to publish a complete list of all those being held in detention without charge;
* to speed up investigations into the cases of all detainees in the country;
* to charge and bring to trial without delay all detainees suspected of a criminal or political
offence;
* to ensure in the meantime that all detainees have access to family members, a doctor and
legal counsel of their own choosing;
* to allow an independent judicial inquiry into the circumstances of the death of Flt.Lt.
Domie in 1989;
* to publish in full the investigative report prepared by Jacob Yidana into the murder of
three judges and a retired army officer in June 1982.
We encourage individuals and institutions to write to the following officials, calling on the
authorities to release all political detainees in Ghana immediately and unconditionally unless they
are to be charged with a recognizable criminal offence and given a fair trial.
Flight-Lieutenant J.J.Rawlings
Chairman
Provisional National Defence Council
The Castle, Osu
Accra, Ghana
Nana Akuoku Sarpong
PNDC Secretary for the Interior
The Castle, Osu
Accra, Ghana
Capt.(retd) Kojo Tsikata
PNDC member for Security and Foreign
Affairs
The Castle, Osu
Accra, Ghana
Dr J.L.S. Abbey
Ambassador of Ghana
Embassy of Ghana
3512 International Drive, NW
Washington, DC 20008
Mr. K.B. Asante
High Commissioner for Ghana
Ghana High Commission
104 Highgate Hill
London N19
News from Africa Watch 9 August 12, 1991
Previous Africa Watch Newsletters on Ghana
1989
* Ghana: Lawyers Detained for Commemorating Judges' Murder, July 14
1990
* Ghana: Official Attacks on Religious Freedom, May 18
Africa Watch is a non-governmental organization created in May 1988 to monitor human rights practices in Africa, and to promote respect for internationally recognized standards. Its Chair is William Carmichael; its Vice Chair is Alice Brown; its Executive Director is Rakiya Omaar; its Associate Director is Alex de Waal; its Research Associates are Janet Fleischman and Karen Sorensen; its Associates are Ben Penglase and Jo Graham. Africa Watch is part of Human Rights Watch, an organization that comprises Americas Watch, Asia Watch, Helsinki Watch and Middle East Watch. The Chair of Human Rights Watch is Robert L. Bernstein and the Vice Chair is Adrian DeWind. Aryeh Neier is Executive Director of Human Rights Watch; Ken Roth is Deputy
Director; Holly Burkhalter is Washington Director; Susan Osnos is Press Director.

Mr Kennedy, Radicals Are:

Dear Mr. Kennedy:

When Bill Clinton supported the Weathermen 25 years before he ran for president, he supported radicals. When Hillary urgered the pardon of a FLAN terrorist convicted of killing a NYPD police officer, she supported radicals. When you support the left wing ANTI-WAR effort, you support radicals.

Ted yesterday, you defined anyone who supported equal admission standards as a radical; are the 70% of all Americans who believe that most university admissions standards are unfair are radicals? Are you trying to say the 1st amendment only protects the hooded marxist with links to Hugo Chavez and not the soccer mom next door who only wants the best for her child?

30% of all Anti Iraq War Prostest Rallies are Sponsored by Political Parties with links to Marxist Extremists, The PLO and the PAN ARAB NAZI PARTY (BA'th)

Mr. Kennedy these are radicals

Are you trying to say these are radicals?

In God We Trust

In God We Trust

My Problem With Joe Biden

Joe Biden had a problem today with Judge Alito because the Judge has supported spousal notification in the case of abortion. Our perplexed liberal, Joe Biden, brought up a senario where a women would be at an economic disadvantage if she had to notify her husband if she got an abortion.

That line of thinking seems to me chauvanistic and wrong headed. It assumes that most married women who are in need of an abortion have committed adultury and are economicaly subserviant. Well Joe, it is now the year 2006 and while we do not have flying cars yet, I believe most women are on a relatively equal economic footing with their partners. Does he think women will be branded with the scarlet letter if they notify the father of the unborn child of her intentions?

Moreover, It can be said that in the case of sex crimes, unfit mothers and abusive relationships the need for for notification my actually be a catalyst that settles family conflict. It is often the case the fear of comming forward after a sex crime, the fear of domestic violence and the general lack of consious (in the rare case of unfit mothers) prevent the resolution of issues that are better addressed sooner rather than later. The final outcome under that senario would be benificial for both the mother, the father and society as a whole.

But everybody says testing is good.

Here is another case where group think may have ruined thousands of lives by fostering unsound medical advice.

Prostate Tests Draw New Questions

Associated PressJanuary 10, 2006; Page D4

Two widely used tests for prostate cancer failed to save lives in a new study, adding to the debate over whether men should be screened for the disease.
The study was small -- only 1,002 men -- and won't be the final word on the issue. But it may hint at what lies ahead when the results of two large studies of prostate-cancer screening appear in a few years.

The researchers looked at two screening tests that are performed millions of times a year in the U.S.: a blood test that measures prostate specific antigen, or PSA, and a digital rectal exam, the rubber-glove test in which a doctor feels for abnormalities in the prostate through the rectal wall.

Study co-author John Concato, a clinical epidemiologist at the VA Connecticut Healthcare System, said that for now, doctors should tell men that screening tests for prostate cancer aren't perfect, and men should decide for themselves whether to get screened.
In the study, published in yesterday's Archives of Internal Medicine, researchers compared two groups of men treated at 10 Veterans Affairs medical centers.
Doctors have long known that some cases of prostate cancer can be so slow-growing that they never cause symptoms, much less death. In addition, surgery and radiation treatment for prostate cancer can cause incontinence and impotence. So for some men, detecting prostate cancer early through screening can do more harm than good.
In addition, the PSA tests can yield ambiguous results. Most men who undergo a biopsy because they have elevated PSA levels don't have prostate cancer. And some men with low PSA levels do have cancer.

Medical organizations differ on their screening recommendations. But generally, most say men should be told the risks and benefits of screening first.
"We should tell patients about the uncertainty," said Howard Parnes of the National Cancer Institute. "All too often we behave as if we know screening is a good thing."

The findings support an earlier review by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. That agency said in 2002 that it found "insufficient evidence" for a recommendation that men be screened.

Critisim of the GOP

Ronald Reagan and Newt Gingrich were real republicans. They stood up for thier ideas, the paid a political price for thier beliefs and doing what they felt was right for our country. Today's Republicans seem to be more interested in providing perks to likes of Jack Abramoff than in defending the policies of the President and Americans from terror.

The fact is IRAQ did have WMD and the UN was holding IRAQ's WMDs in "safe keeping". Moreover, Saddam's regime had trained terrorists, had paid terrorists, had housed terrorists, had transported terrorists and had given known terrorists that had a history of killing innocent people in over a dozen countries a celebrated status in Iraqi society.

The fact is Saddam and his Bath party was not secular humanist. In a 1998 speech made by Saddam, he support Sunnis Islam, said he was defender of Sunnis Islam, was a participant of the global Jihad against the USA and said "other Arabs had to join the fight against America." Clearly, these are times when the brave have to stand and be counted and clearly many in the GOP have not stood for what is right and what is true.

An Another NY Times Correction, Read Carefully

An article on Sunday about a federal appeals court ruling that reversed its own decision and upheld a $54.6 million jury-trial verdict against two retired Salvadoran generals found responsible for torture during the 1980's civil war misstated the role of the Center for Justice and Accountability, a human rights law group. It represented the plaintiffs - the torture victims - not the defendants.